September 27, 2025
Headlines

Harvard caves in to Zionist threats, adopts IHRA definition to suppress pro-Palestine activity

admin1696 mins mins

22 January 2025

Harvard University, facing lawsuits for allegedly failing to protect Jewish students from antisemitism on campus, has agreed to employ the IHRA definition of antisemitism when sanctioning students for demonstrating against, or even openly criticising, Israel’s Apartheid and genocidal policies. As is by now well known, the eleven “illustrations” appended to the IHRA definition crudely conflate criticism of Israel with antisemitism, making almost any criticism of the policies of this state subject to sanction. Thus free speech and the right to peacefully demonstrate take another massive hit at a university once highly respected in the world of learning.

Harvard Adopts a Definition of Antisemitism for Discipline Cases

Many universities have been reluctant to embrace a definition that, among other things, considers some criticisms of Israel as antisemitic. The university’s decision was part of a lawsuit settlement.

Students walk on Harvard’s campus.
The Harvard University campus in Cambridge, Mass.Credit…Sophie Park for The New York Times

By Vimal Patel

Jan. 21, 2025

Harvard University will adopt a definition of antisemitism when investigating discipline cases as part of several moves meant to protect Jewish students after Gaza war protests, the university said in an agreement on Tuesday.

The definition includes some criticisms of Israel as examples of antisemitism, including calling Israel’s existence a “racist endeavor.”

It was part of a settlement in two lawsuits filed by Jewish groups that accused the school of not doing enough to prevent and punish antisemitism on campus. Last year, a federal judge in Boston allowed the cases to go forward.

The move by Harvard was unusual. Many universities have shied away from adopting any definition of antisemitism, even as pressure on them to do so has increased in response to campus conflicts related to the war in Gaza.

The definition Harvard is using has been criticized as blurring the line between antisemitism and arguments against Israel and Zionism.

Kenneth Marcus, chairman of the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, a Jewish civil rights group, said that he hoped other universities would adopt the definition.

“Zionist is often a code word for Jews,” he said, adding, “Harvard is making clear that rules against Zionists are as objectionable as rules against Jews.”

But Kenneth Stern, who helped draft the definition while he was at the American Jewish Committee, has since become a critic of the definition’s use in academic settings, saying it could stifle open debate on the Middle East, an issue that has divided campuses since the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas on Israel.

“I would much rather universities make clear that nobody is going to be harassed for any reason and avoid these types of issues on speech,” said Mr. Stern, now the director of the Bard Center for the Study of Hate.

Previously, Harvard’s policies prevented discrimination based on religion, national origin and ancestry, among other categories, which covered antisemitism. What is new is that the university will now consider a definition of antisemitism that was put forward by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance when investigating complaints.

The definition from the group is uncontroversial. It defines antisemitism as a “certain perception of Jews that may be expressed as hatred” toward them. But it also lists examples that include holding Israel to a “double standard” or describing the creation of Israel as a “racist endeavor.”

Harvard, Mr. Stern said, was “opening a can of worms,” giving a tool for students to file complaints about professors, for example. “If you’re a faculty member, you know people are hunting for things,” he said.

Harvard has been under an intense public spotlight since the war broke out in Gaza. On the night of the Hamas attack, more than 30 student groups posted an open letter that held Israel “entirely responsible.” The university’s former president, Claudine Gay, eventually resigned, in part because of her testimony during a Congressional hearing in which she was accused of not doing enough to combat antisemitism.

Students Against Antisemitism, a group at Harvard, filed a lawsuit in January saying that Harvard had not addressed “severe and pervasive antisemitism on campus.” In May, the Brandeis Center also sued, saying the university ignored antisemitism.

The agreement released on Tuesday settles both cases. One former student in the earlier case declined to join the settlement, which also includes an unspecified amount of money, and will continue to pursue his claim against Harvard, according to the university.

The former student, Shabbos Kestenbaum, who graduated in June, said “the fight is only beginning.” He said he was working closely with the White House and that “Harvard can expect to be penalized in the weeks ahead.”

Harvard’s move comes a day after the inauguration of President Trump, who has said that colleges “must end the antisemitism propaganda” or lose federal support.

According to a 2019 executive order from Mr. Trump, the Education Department and other federal agencies must “consider” the I.H.R.A. definition in civil rights complaints that claim antisemitism. The executive order has caused confusion among university administrators about what is expected from them, however, and several dozen schools are currently under investigation.

Critics of using the definition in academia say policies already exist that bar harassment of Jewish students, and that the I.H.R.A. definition is more about cracking down on speech related to Israel.

Jeffrey S. Flier, the former dean of the Harvard Medical School, said on social media that the I.H.R.A. definition does not “by itself prohibit or punish speech.”

“Once adopted by Harvard,” he wrote, “the definition must be used in a manner consistent with other applicable legal principles, and principles of academic freedom and free speech.”

Under the lawsuit agreement, Harvard also must establish a partnership with an Israeli university, hire someone who will be consulted on all antisemitism complaints, and allow the Brandeis Center “to host a variety of events on campus,” Harvard said in a statement. The Kennedy School, Harvard’s public policy school, must allow three alumni to host an event “on the substantive issues of Israeli Jewish democracy.”

The university also must post on its website the following statement: “For many Jewish people, Zionism is a part of their Jewish identity. Conduct that would violate the Non-Discrimination Policy if targeting Jewish or Israeli people can also violate the policy if directed toward Zionists.”

A Harvard spokesman said in a statement that the university “will continue to implement robust steps to maintain a welcoming, open and safe campus environment where every student feels a sense of belonging.”

169 thoughts on “Harvard caves in to Zionist threats, adopts IHRA definition to suppress pro-Palestine activity”

  85. Indian Meds One [url=https://indianmedsone.com/#]Indian Meds One[/url] pharmacy website india

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related News